Table 5 Acceptability questionnaire
n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
Theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) | n = 63 | |
1. How acceptable was the pain management review? | Acceptable or completely acceptable | 45 (90%) |
2. Did you like or dislike the pain management review? | Like or strongly like | 38 (76%) |
3. How much effort did it take to participate in the pain management review? | No effort at all or A little effort | 44 (88%) |
4. How fair (to all patients) is a system where patients with long-term pain are invited for a routine pain management review? | Fair or very fair | 42 (84%) |
5. The pain management review is likely to change how I manage my pain | Agree or strongly agree | 30 (60%) |
6. It is clear to me how the pain management review I attended with the clinical pharmacist will help me manage my pain | Agree or strongly agree | 33 (66%) |
7. How confident would you feel about making changes to how you manage your pain? | Confident or very confident | 34 (68%) |
8. Making changes to how I manage my pain will interfere with my other priorities | Strongly disagree or disagree No opinion | 24 (48%) 14 (28%) |
Modified acceptability and credibility measure | 0-10 scale, mean (SD) | |
9. How logical does this type of review seem to you? | Not logical — very logical | 7.83 (2.14) |
10. How successful do you think the review will be in changing how you manage your pain? | Not successful — very successful | 6.14 (2.72) |
11. How confident would you be in recommending this review to a friend? | Not confident — very confident | 7.29 (2.82) |
12. How much improvement in your ability to manage pain do you think will occur? | No improvement — much improvement | 5.44 (2.74) |